Law and Labour
Employment law issues
Our Sections
Cases
Part-year workers’ holiday need not be pro-rated to full-time workers
Gender-critical views were part of protected belief
Gender reassignment includes non-binary and gender fluid persons
Holiday pay for ‘part-year workers’ need not be pro-rated
Claimant’s right to privacy insufficient to prevent online pu...
Morrisons’ liability for data breach confirmed
Recruitment company liable for director’s fight at Christmas afterp...
TUPE did not bar employer from removing outdated travel allowance
Complaints lacked sufficient facts to be whistleblowing disclosures
Pimlico Plumbers loses Supreme Court appeal about plumber’s status ...
News
Employment Rights Bill update
Employment Rights Bill introduced
Employment rights get an uplift from new Labour Government
P&O Ferries: was firing 800 staff unlawful?
Coronavirus job retention scheme announced
Supreme Court abolishes Employment Tribunal fees
Morrisons faces huge bill following data theft
ILO report confirms trend towards less secure jobs
New whistleblowing Code of Practice for employers
Holiday pay update: Lock decision
Articles
P&O Ferries: was firing 800 staff unlawful?
5 ways employers can prepare for the GDPR
Five tips for handling fighting in the workplace
Byron Burgers gets a grilling over illegal workers
How might Brexit affect employment law?
Uber: who’s the boss?
Conservative Government’s employment law proposals
Monitoring employees’ use of the Internet
Whistleblowing: prescribed persons to publish annual reports
A fighting chance
Sectors
Digital business
Education
Energy and Utilities
Financial services
Healthcare
Hospitality
Public sector
Retail
Transport
About Law and Labour
Get In Touch
Posts Tagged ‘Supreme Court’
Blog
READ MORE
Part-year workers’ holiday need not be pro-rated to full-time workers
READ MORE
Pimlico Plumbers loses Supreme Court appeal about plumber’s status as worker
READ MORE
Supreme Court abolishes Employment Tribunal fees
READ MORE
Reason for indirect discrimination need not be proven
READ MORE
Supreme Court upholds injunction to prevent disciplinary hearing going ahead
Tags
Auto enrolment
Collective redundancies
Constructive dismissal
Court of Appeal
Data protection
Disability
Disciplinary
Discrimination
Employee-owner
Employment Appeal Tribunal
Employment contracts
Employment status
Equal pay
European Court of Human Rights
European Court of Justice
Fire and rehire
Flexible working
George Osborne
Gig economy
GMB union
Government
High Court of Justice
Holiday pay
Human rights
National Minimum Wage
Nick Clegg
Parental leave
Pensions
Race discrimination
Redundancy
Religion and belief discrimination
Sharing economy
Supreme Court
Trade unions
Tribunal fees
Tribunal procedure
TUPE
Uber
Unfair dismissal
Vicarious liability
whistleblowing
Worker
Working time
Workplace fighting
Zero hours contracts
Sections
17 August 2022
Part-year workers’ holiday need not be pro-rated to full-time workers
by
Law and Labour
13 June 2021
Gender-critical views were part of protected belief
by
Law and Labour
6 December 2020
Gender reassignment includes non-binary and gender fluid persons
by
Law and Labour
10 August 2019
Holiday pay for ‘part-year workers’ need not be pro-rated
by
Law and Labour
10 February 2019
Claimant’s right to privacy insufficient to prevent online publication of judgment
by
Law and Labour
4 November 2018
Morrisons’ liability for data breach confirmed
by
Law and Labour
17 October 2018
Recruitment company liable for director’s fight at Christmas afterparty
by
Law and Labour
VIEW ALL
Search for:
Copyright © 2025 Law and Labour, All Rights Reserved.
Fonts by
Google Fonts
. Icons by
Fontello
. Full Credits
here »