Cases
Part-year workers’ holiday need not be pro-rated to full-time workers

Gender-critical views were part of protected belief

Gender reassignment includes non-binary and gender fluid persons

Holiday pay for ‘part-year workers’ need not be pro-rated

Claimant’s right to privacy insufficient to prevent online pu...

Morrisons’ liability for data breach confirmed

Recruitment company liable for director’s fight at Christmas afterp...

TUPE did not bar employer from removing outdated travel allowance

Complaints lacked sufficient facts to be whistleblowing disclosures

Pimlico Plumbers loses Supreme Court appeal about plumber’s status ...
News
Employment Rights Bill update

Employment Rights Bill introduced

Employment rights get an uplift from new Labour Government

P&O Ferries: was firing 800 staff unlawful?

Coronavirus job retention scheme announced

Supreme Court abolishes Employment Tribunal fees

Morrisons faces huge bill following data theft

ILO report confirms trend towards less secure jobs

New whistleblowing Code of Practice for employers

Holiday pay update: Lock decision
Articles
P&O Ferries: was firing 800 staff unlawful?

5 ways employers can prepare for the GDPR

Five tips for handling fighting in the workplace

Byron Burgers gets a grilling over illegal workers

How might Brexit affect employment law?

Uber: who’s the boss?

Conservative Government’s employment law proposals

Monitoring employees’ use of the Internet

Whistleblowing: prescribed persons to publish annual reports

A fighting chance

Posts Tagged ‘Employment Appeal Tribunal’

Blog

Gender-critical views were part of protected belief

Claimant’s right to privacy insufficient to prevent online publication of judgment

Xerox employee’s job did not transfer to the Philippines

Asda equal pay claims can go ahead

Culpability not relevant to whether JP Morgan employee was unfairly dismissed

Outgoing service provider in TUPE transfer need not identify contractual terms

Is a disciplinary hearing without the employee unfair?

Director’s unsigned contract was not binding

Pension scheme did not discriminate against employees taking ill-health retirement

Employment Tribunal incorrectly assessed the compensation due in prison officer’s claim

Who may be a sub-contractor’s client under TUPE?

Asking nursery worker to wear a shorter jilbab was not discriminatory

1 2

Sections

17 August 2022

Part-year workers’ holiday need not be pro-rated to full-time workers

by Law and Labour

13 June 2021

Gender-critical views were part of protected belief

by Law and Labour

6 December 2020

Gender reassignment includes non-binary and gender fluid persons

by Law and Labour

10 August 2019

Holiday pay for ‘part-year workers’ need not be pro-rated

by Law and Labour

10 February 2019

Claimant’s right to privacy insufficient to prevent online publication of judgment

by Law and Labour

4 November 2018

Morrisons’ liability for data breach confirmed

by Law and Labour

17 October 2018

Recruitment company liable for director’s fight at Christmas afterparty

by Law and Labour

VIEW ALL

Fonts by Google Fonts. Icons by Fontello. Full Credits here »

Law and Labour

Posts Tagged ‘Employment Appeal Tribunal’

Gender-critical views were part of protected belief

Claimant’s right to privacy insufficient to prevent online publication of judgment

Xerox employee’s job did not transfer to the Philippines

Asda equal pay claims can go ahead

Culpability not relevant to whether JP Morgan employee was unfairly dismissed

Outgoing service provider in TUPE transfer need not identify contractual terms

Is a disciplinary hearing without the employee unfair?

Director’s unsigned contract was not binding

Pension scheme did not discriminate against employees taking ill-health retirement

Employment Tribunal incorrectly assessed the compensation due in prison officer’s claim

Who may be a sub-contractor’s client under TUPE?

Asking nursery worker to wear a shorter jilbab was not discriminatory

Tags